Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife spoke at event featuring Oath Keepers founder


The wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at a conservative symposium featuring the founder of the Oath Keepers, an extremist militia group that prosecutors said planned the Capitol riot.

Virginia ‘Ginni’ Thomas, an activist and attorney, co-hosted a Remember the Ladies Banquet at the Liberty XPO & Symposium in 2010, which since been called the ‘largest conservative training event in history’. 

The line-up of speakers at the DC symposium also included Stewart Rhodes, who founded Oath Keepers in 2009, the New Yorker reported. The militia group leader was arrested earlier this month and charged with seditious conspiracy in connection to the January 6 insurrection. He has pleaded not guilty.

Rhodes is just one of several ties Thomas has to the riot.

Virginia Thomas (left), wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (right), spoke at a 2010 conservative symposium featuring the founder of the Oath Keepers, an extremist militia group that prosecutors said planned the Capitol riot


Thomas, an activist and attorney, co-hosted a Remember the Ladies Banquet at the Liberty XPO & Symposium in 2010, which was called the ‘largest conservative training event in history’

Her symposium co-host, Moms for America president Kimberly Fletcher, is also accused of inciting the insurrection.

She allegedly gave two speeches on January 5, 2021 and ‘spread the false claim that the 2020 election had been stolen’ from former President Donald Trump. She does appear to face charges in connection to the riot.

The event’s line-up featured Stewart Rhodes (pictured), who founded Oath Keepers in 2009. Rhodes was arrested earlier this month and charged with seditious conspiracy in connection to the January 6 insurrection. He has pleaded not guilty

The unveiling of Thomas’ connections followed the Supreme Court on Wednesday rejecting a bid by Trump to provide more than 700 pages of presidential documents – including presidential diaries, visitor logs, speech drafts and handwritten notes dealing with Jan. 6 from the files of former chief of staff Mark Meadows – for the House committee’s investigation into the events of January 6.

Thomas’ husband, Justice Clarence Thomas issued the only dissenting vote.  

The New Yorker also alleged that Thomas is involved with people whose cases have been presented before her husband in the Supreme Court. 

Additionally, Thomas has served on Turning Point USA’s advisory board. 

The organization, which touts itself as a pro-Trump student group, allegedly sent ‘busloads of protestors’ to Washington DC on the day of the insurrection.

Thomas’ political activism has prompted controversy for years, the magazine reported. It has often been dismissed as the ‘harmless action of an independent spouse,’ but some argue the it could be used to help her allies in ‘highly polarizing cases’.

‘In the twenty-first century, there’s a feeling that spouses are not joined at the hip,’ Bruce Green, an ethics professor at Fordham, said, arguing ‘the appearance’ of Thomas’ political pursuits ‘is awful’.

Thomas’ political activism has prompted controversy for years. It has often been dismissed as the ‘harmless action of an independent spouse,’ but some argue the it could be used to help her allies in ‘highly polarizing cases’ (Pictured: The Thomas’ as seen last October)

‘They look like a mom-and-pop political-hack group, where she does the political stuff and he does the judging.’

He added: ‘She’s got the ear of a Justice, and surely they talk about their work.’ 

‘I think Ginni Thomas is behaving horribly, and she’s hurt the Supreme Court and the administration of justice. It’s reprehensible. If you could take a secret poll of the other eight Justices, I have no doubt that they are appalled by Virginia Thomas’s behavior. But what can they do?’ argued New York University law professor Stephen Gillers.

Thomas has not been named as a ‘a party to the proceeding’ or ‘an officer, director, or trustee of an organization’ in any case of the Supreme Court’s docket, nor is she litigating any such cases.

While some may argue her activism toes the ethical line for her husband, she has not put him in a situation where he is required to recuse himself.  



Source link

Spread the love

Leave a Reply Cancel reply